The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications. Your manuscript is already in great shape but please go through our guidelines below that specify the correct formatting of your final resubmission to avoid delays towards formal acceptance. Elsevier is currently publishing not only the time to 1st decision and publication but also the CiteScore, Impact Factor, and Acceptance rate of their journals. So dont feel upset! Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. Nature's subeditors are happy to advise authors about the format of their Articles after acceptance for publication. Authors submitting to Nature do so on the understanding that they agree to these policies. Need help with your experiments? So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. What does editor decision started mean nature? A referee might be selected for expertise in only one area, for example to judge if a statistical analysis is appropriate, or if a particular technique that is essential to underpin the conclusion has been undertaken properly. However, the Editor, in the rejection letter, provided an objective explanation for this long wait. How long do editor decisions take at Science/Nature? [CDATA[> Internet Explorer). 2022.11.25 Editor Decision Started (All Reviewer Assigned) 1212All Reviewer AssignedManuscript under consideration Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision; Accept; Decisions are communicated to the corresponding author in a formal letter, along with reviewer feedback and any other requirements from the . How do I get published in Nature or Science? Editor decision started might sound like the editor is going to bench reject your paper, but thats not necessarily the case. Authors are provided the opportunity to opt out of this scheme at the completion of the peer review process, before the paper is accepted. It's true that editorial rejections can be very rapid based on scope and perceived 'gee whiz' factor. Directly from with editor, to decision under process. Nature editors will normally honour requests that a paper not be sent to one or two (but no more) competing groups for review. Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. To borrow a phrase that Bertolt Brecht originally wrote about science itself, the chief aim of our appeals process is not to open a door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error., Decisions, decisions. 9.3 weeks. PRX editors make every effort to arrive at a clear decision on the disposition of a manuscript within a reasonable time. Did you find it helpful? I've had Nature hold up papers for months and been forced out by a singe powerful reviewer with advice to publish the paper in another highly ranked (but not glamour mag) journal. To avoid such conflicts of interest, Nature requires potential referees to disclose any professional and commercial competing interests before undertaking to review a paper, and requires referees not to copy papers or to circulate them to un-named colleagues. you're still in the running. But in view of. Finding reviewers who agree to deal with the . They are, instead, rewarded non-financially by means of acknowledgment in journals, positions on editorial boards, free journal access, discounts on author fees, etc. How can we prove that the supernatural or paranormal doesn't exist? Many papers are published online ahead of print publication date: corresponding authors of these papers will be informed by e-mail when the online publication date is confirmed, one week ahead of publication. PIs gone AWOL? Research suggests that . Editors, on the other hand, must guard against a different category of mistake, as it is their responsibility to balance the intense investment of the authors in a particular decision against the more diffuse interests not only of their readers but also of other authors. If the manuscript was transferred to us from another Nature Research journal, we will not publish reviewer reports or author rebuttals of versions of the manuscript considered by the originating Nature Research journal. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. If the authors feel that they have a strong scientific case for reconsideration (if the referees have missed the point of the paper, for example) they can appeal the decision in writing. March 1, 2023 - As we approach, on March 14, its 12-year anniversary, now is as good a time as any to reflect on Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Rule 206 (4)-5 (the "Pay-to-Play Rule . //--> Hopefully, the exact situation will become clear with the next status update. One perk, however, is having the choice and control over what I . ISSN 0028-0836 (print), report original scientific research (the main results and conclusions must not have been published or submitted elsewhere). Revised papers should be accompanied by a point-by-point response to all the comments made by all the referees. Under these circumstances, the editors letter will state explicitly whether or not a resubmitted version would be considered. //--> When facing rejection, many of us don't even know that there is a formal process of appealing the decision. If your article is accepted, it could take anywhere from a few months to three years for the journal to publish your piece. Peer review comments, cover letter and more. The categories includeroughly in order of persuasivenessnew data or analysis, factual errors by referees or editors, disagreement with technical criticisms, evidence of referee bias, procedural concerns and disputes over novelty or significance. If appropriate, delegate parts of the response to one or more of the co-authors. //-->